How much of a photodump is too much of a photodump?

"Flavien Vidal" (flyingfrenchy) 01/30/2015 at 19:22 • Filed to: None

1

18

Hey guys, what do you think should be the maximum in term of number of images, for a photodump?

I'm lucky enough to have a PC that can pretty much take on anything, but I remember when checking porn random pictures on internet before with my old laptop... It could be real slow at times...

So what do you think is the maximum?

(Asking because I went to the Toyota Museum yesterday and well... There is one hell of a dump on the way :) )

Brian Silvestro > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:24

0

mother of god

TheHondaBro > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:24

0

Unload the biggest dump you can muster.

Doge_Supreme drives a BRZ > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:25

0

I was testing how many pictures I could post. I'm pretty sure it's well over 100. I could post 150ish at once it just took 15 minutes to upload them all.

quarterlifecrisis > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:28

2

I usually put 5-10 images in a post, then link to an inbedded flickr slideshow.

Flavien Vidal > Doge_Supreme drives a BRZ 01/30/2015 at 19:29

0

Yeam I have well over 100 pictures to post...

Flavien Vidal > Brian Silvestro 01/30/2015 at 19:33

1

yeah.... there's a lot :)

About 200 pictures total with certainly over 100 to be posted...

Steve in Manhattan > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:37

0

Depends on what they are - these, we surely want to see ....

Flavien Vidal > quarterlifecrisis 01/30/2015 at 19:38

1

Yeah but I like the pictures to be readily available... I personnally rarely click on slideshows... I do however scoll down photodumps easily... Also I want to comment on each picture, a quick history of each car pictured...

cbell04 > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:38

0

I have been working on a license plate dump and have reached mega dump status. Im rethinking my post as it now takes a while to load. was kind of a test of kinja but im sure someone has already exposed its limits so id be better off searching that rather than spending time creating a post that could implode at any moment. But when it comes to actual content dump away.

Flavien Vidal > cbell04 01/30/2015 at 19:40

0

Cool good to know... I might just do it in 2 or 3 parts to ease the load on that poor kinja :)

quarterlifecrisis > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:41

0

Ah. I think it makes it easier, since the slideshow is embedded, all you have to do is click through, and the page doesn't take forever to load. I would split it up into 30-50 photos otherwise.

Flavien Vidal > cbell04 01/30/2015 at 19:41

0

Holy crap, that's one hell of a dump! (just checked your post) Wow!!

cbell04 > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:43

0

did it load ok? I had to stop because timewarner cable is jacked llately. They just did a service call and fixed my connection issues so might try to add more

Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 19:47

0

You could post your favorites and then post a link to an imgur album, or something like that.

Flavien Vidal > cbell04 01/30/2015 at 19:48

0

Yeah it's alright... It's not instant, but I could browse no problem while it loaded.

OPPOsaurus WRX > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 20:06

0

the limit should be to

Or

desertdog5051 > Flavien Vidal 01/30/2015 at 20:48

0

From an attention standpoint, I would say 15. After that number you lose the attention of the recipient. Break the post into segments and do it in several posts.

elfakkeroo > Flavien Vidal 01/31/2015 at 17:19

0

There is no " poor kinja ". Kinja is the enemy! KILL IT WITH FIRE! MOAR FIREZZZZ!!!